The Progressive Definition by Matthew A Rink
No clear cut definition exists as to just what exactly is meant by the terms "progressive
music," "progressive rock," or "progressive metal." To get a true
sense of what these terms mean, one must take into consideration all the sub-genres, properties,
styles, characteristics, and all the other abstract qualities that surround it.
Such an effort would be remiss, however, if I didn't state clearly that which I think progressive
music IS NOT. For my own part, I happen to think that way too much emphasis is placed on the
idea that the "progressive" adjective suggests, or even requires, that the genre's music be
some sort of ever-evolving entity. I believe this notion to be laughable. I feel that the title
"progressive" is no more than a descriptive term by which to classify music
with certain qualities, not an instruction that obligates the music to a strict sense
of development. In truth, it is more accurate in my mind to attribute the origin of the term "progressive"
to that of "music that has progressed beyond that of conventional music" rather than "music that is
continually progressing". So, while I certainly have no desire for a stagnant, repetitve prog rock scene, I think
it is considerably off the mark, excessively broad, and perhaps overly idealistic, to cling to the ideal that
"progressive" music implies constant change.
Progressive Properties
To begin, I will list and define some of the general characteristics of progressive music:
1) Longer songs
2) Time changes
3) More complex instrumentation / Superior vocals
4) More complex conceptual ideas / Heightened lyrical content
1) Longer songs - Generally speaking, prog bands have a tendency to create very long ("epic")
songs, generally a combination of greater lyrical content and some very lengthy instrumental passages.
More often than not, these songs will break away from the traditional verse/chorus song structure and
will be broken up into different parts or movements (though usually not divided into separate tracks on
the CD, itself). This creates something along the lines of an orchestral suite or an album within an
album. For example, Rush's 2112 as an album does not really hold to any one concept, but the 20
minute, multi-part title track is a song that plays like an album. Generally, I'd say most songs by
prog bands are somewhere between 5 - 10 min long, with average song durations being in the ballpark of
7 minutes or so. The extreme cases -- like the example above -- can be 20 minutes or more.
2) Time changes - One element that can dub a band "progressive" is the time change or odd-beat
characteristic. I'm not going to pretend to know everything about this, but there is a noticeable
difference between the structure of songs with really common beats (like 4/4) and those that use diverse
and complicated rhythms and/or switch between beats (like 7/4, 11/8, 9/4, free-time, etc...). Many prog
bands have very talented drummers and are able to put it all together very nicely. Yet, at first, many
(myself included) may find certain bands or albums hard to "get into." This usually stems from
songs less than conventional song structures that take a little work to follow along with. Within a few
listens, though, it usually clicks.
3) More complex instrumentation / Superior vocals - The instrumentation is another element that will
separate ordinary rock/metal from progressive rock/metal. Commonly, one will find some type of
piano, keyboard, and/or synthesizer among a prog band's repetoire. Also, one may find strings (violins,
cellos, etc), flute, timpano, and other more peculiar instruments mixed in with the guitar and drum
setup typically found in rock and metal to produce the "progressive" sound. To an extent,
progressive music will tend to have a more classical influence than would your typical, blues-based rock
music. This powerful and beautiful mix of rock and symphonic elements was my initial draw to prog music.
Furthermore, there is a certain higher standard of talent set by many progressive artists. Countless prog
musicians could be considered virtuosos at their respective positions, usually with both passion and
technical ability. There is essentially NO three-chord song in the world of prog (sure there's
"June" by Spock's Beard and Marillion's "After Me," but....)
Another emblematic aspect of prog music is the incredible range and singing
ability of many of the genre's vocalists. Sure, prog bands put a very large emphasis on the music, but
more often than not you'll see wonderful vocals in front of the music. Emotional Broadway-style displays, Multi-part counterpoint vocal melodies, and other
layered vocal arrangements and choirs not only deliver a message, but also enhance the music, and
becoming part of it.
4) More complex conceptual ideas / Heightened lyrical content - Not unrelated to the first property on
the list, prog bands -- for the most part -- seem to undertake massive projects in developing ideas in
their songs and albums. As a rule, lyrics in progressive music tends to be of a more sophisticated and
intellectual nature -- sometimes fantasy based, sometimes pure original fiction, and sometimes dealing
with heartfelt human emotion. No matter what the case, like true poets, usually these ideas are
not blatantly brought out to the forefront. Instead they are set back - not really hidden, but not always
completely obvious, either -- waiting to be discovered (and duly interpreted) by the listener. A
somewhat common element of progressive music is the "concept album" (or "rock-opera"),
which is basically a storyline or theme-based work in which the individual songs on an album all relate
to one another to either directly recount a story or to immerse the listener into a more abstract
experience.
And the Categories Are...?
There are many sub-genres related to the world of progressive music that you'll stumble across. This list
of terms will most certainly not be a complete list of prog music types. This is basically just a rundown
of some of the genre-related terms I may use in this text or in my reviews.
1) Progressive rock & Progressive metal
2) Symphonic rock
3) Neo-prog
4) Art-rock
5) Technical Metal
6) Neo-classical & Power Metal
7) Fusion, Experimental, Broadway metal & Opera metal, Houston-scene rock, Prog-pop, Doom, AOR
1) Progressive rock & Progressive metal - These are the two major divisions of
progressive music from which many other categories can be sub-classified. Basically, prog metal
will combine elements of heavy metal (such as heavily distorted guitars and fast rhythms) with
some or all of those prog traits outlined in the above section, while prog rock combines a less
"edgy" (rock / hard rock) sound with those aforementioned characteristics.
2) Symphonic rock - A relitively easy one, symphonic rock lumps together those bands that seem to draw
heavily from incorporating orchestral and classical influences into their music. This term is generally
seen attached to 70s progressive bands, though it would not be out of the question to label some of
today's bands as such. Still, many of the less progressive metal bands that incorporate symphonic
elements will less arguably fall into the category of "power metal" (see below).
3) Neo-prog - This term I saw for the first time being used to describe the sound of the band Marillion.
Generally, neo-prog acts have a very identifiable, keyboard driven sound that to my ears seems to have
originated with old Genesis. Marillion carried this torch in the 80s, with bands like IQ, Saga, and
Arena being the biggest names in neo-prog currently.
4) Art-rock - Here is a term I've see get kicked around a little in prog conversations. In my mind,
"art" is just used primarily as a substitute for "progressive" in most contexts.
That said, this term also seems carry a bit of a tone-downed connotation. That is, many times when a
band is being described in this manner, the writer seems to have reservations abount classifying the band
as a full fledged prog band. For me, this term has taken on the meaning of "prog-lite."
5) Technical Metal - A term used to describe certain bands that play an especially complex and skilled
style of heavy metal music. These bands usually write songs soley for the sake of showcasing
musicians' abilities and expressing creatively and experimentally with music. Often this goes so far as
to mean completely abandoning the idea of memorable or emotional song-writing in pursuit of creating
stunningly complex material.
6) Neo-classical & Power Metal - For the most part, these two go hand in hand. Neo-classical is
actually a sub-genre under power metal, and, as its name suggests, describes bands whose sound is a
modern-classical sound. Speedy guitar riffs and solos that may sound more like Mozart or Paganini set the
stage, while violins, harpsichords, and choirs give a very convincingly classical edge to the music.
Among the most "popular " bands of this nature are Symphony X and Stratovarius. Power metal
refers to the genre that speed metal evolved into as bands like Helloween introduced more of a melodic
flair and greater variety into the genre. The sound is not necessarily more "powerful" or
"louder" in any way, but power metal bands usually have catchier, more anthem-like songs with
more fantasy-based subject matter and really strong choruses. Song structure is sometimes crescendo'ed
around these choruses thus creating a more theatrical, dramatic, and/or emotionally "powerful"
sound. This can be quite distinct from progressive metal -- many power metal bands are not really
progressive at all, though when they employ symphonic instrumentation or operatic choral effects --
even odd time signatures -- lines between power and progressive metal can become blurred. The bands
Symphony X and Angra, for instance.
7) Fusion, Experimental, Broadway metal & Opera metal, Houston-scene rock, Prog-pop, Doom, AOR - The list
goes on and on and on. As you can see, Progressive Music can be a very broad term. In time I hope to
touch on each of these categories.
Who is progressive?
You may be wondering just what kinds of popular, more mainstream bands may be considered progressive.
Some bands that have achieved certain levels of mainstream success will always be debated as to whether
or not they should indeed be considered truly progressive. Bands such as Rush, Pink Floyd, Jethro Tull,
Yes, and ELP (Emerson, Lake, and Palmer), Queen, and Alan Parsons Project are some of the more well-known
names in prog. Since their time (the 1970's was the height of prog's place in society) progressive music
has kind of fallen into obscurity. Bands who have begun to lead a new, mostly underground revival of prog
into some degree of media exposure have been Marillion, Fates Warning, Queensryche, Savatage, and
(more recently) Dream Theater and Trans-Siberian Orchestra.
The Progressive Ego
I wasn't really sure where this fit in, but I just couldn't ignore it. Yes, there is a certain arrogance
found in many fans of progressive music. I am not going to deny this. It's basically the, "the music
I listen to is so much more intellectual, mature, sophisticated, and special than everything else"
attitude. Music snobbery, if you will. Well, this sentiment exists for good reason...all those things are
true about progressive music! It's just definitively better. So out of this comes the "progressive
ego." As fans of progressive music, it's as if we belong to some exclusive, prestigious club. We
alone know the secrets. We realize such truths as that truly great music can only be experienced while
listening with headphones and studying the album's beautiful cover-art. Unlike most exclusive clubs,
however, this one is open to any and all people. That is, any and all people who seek to expand their
musical horizons to the distant reaches beyond what our mainstream pop-culture has afforded us.